Mekko Graphics for Mac is integrated into PowerPoint for Mac and is.With characteristic Apple elegance, Keynote produces more gracefully designed slides thanMicrosoft Powerpoint 2019 for Mac Create clean presentations to make your business as professional as any of the big businesses. Includes: Microsoft Word 2016.Create better charts, faster in PowerPoint and Excel with the software strategy. Browse your download options and get everything you need to work on your own, collaborate with colleagues and make the most of your Mac. The Microsoft Office for Mac download is available as a one-time purchase or as an Office 365 subscription, which includes the new Office 2016 for Mac as well as the latest updates.Both Keynote and PP serve as competent ProjectorCompatibility: All versions of PowerPoint for both PC and MAC Select Different. Keynote is useful as PP slide reader. Its functions allow you to collaborate, create, edit and present with ease.Clunky PP.
Which Powerpoint To Buy Professional As AnyTrading in reductions in resolution for user convenience or forPitching may useful in mass market products or in commercial art, but not for technicalCommunications. Slideware isContrary to that history. Patches for PP and slide redesigns by commercial artists cannot solveAll history of improvements in human communication is written in terms ofImprovements in resolution: to produce, for viewers of evidence, more bits per unit time, and more bits per unit area. My essay is largely about what happens to the quality of evidence andWhen passing through slideware. About 80% of my essayCould just as well be called The Cognitive Style of Slideware: Pitching Out CorruptsConsequently, slideware redesigns are largely futile exercises solutionsSerious technical reporting are found in good technical reports,Of slides. Unfolded, it is 20 times as large (approximately 24 by 36), and it is 2-sided. Folded it measures 6 inches by 7.5 inches. What a great giveaway that would be!National Geographic last month had a map of the US as its insert. That's rather low tech, but it works pretty well.Yes, there is a limit to the amount of data you can get on a note card but you can easily get bigger note cards and hand them out to the audience so that they can put them as close to their faces as they like.Heck, you could print things at super resolution and hand out magnifying glasses. On this solution, see our thread PowerPoint Does Rocket Science-and Better Techniques for Technical ReportsResponse to Apple's Keynote vs Microsoft PowerPointYes, you can cover a projection screen by a note card held at arm's length, but the point is that you can actually carry the card closer to your eyes and improve the resolution. Make a clickable java application for a macHere's my take on a few things (bullets! Hide!): Does the trade-off of movieness for resolution buy us increased understanding? If so, we ought to use the method or methods that improve our understanding of the process that is generating the data.On screen resolution, data density, and animationRafe brings up some interesting points. The real challenge, as least in my work, is to get the movies to do things in a high enough resolution to make the move from high-resolution paper to low-resolution computer worthwhile. Getting these to survive the transformation into static paper-space is difficult. I don't want to think of the projection equipment that would be necessary to show this information on the computer screen.Time, of course, is often-times best encoded graphically through the use of time as such, data movies can be quite compelling. The other side is entitled "History of the Land" and includes annotations (in complete sentences, no less!) with subtle state boundaries and some more major highways. ![]() Al Gore: another presenter extraordinaire?Please note: I'm not trying to be a Gore cheerleader (some of the comments in the above links bring excellent critique of his conclusions) - but I am very interested in how new technology can support speakers and their messages. Keynote conveniently powers Al Gore's "An Inconvenient Truth" Duarte Design helps Al Gore "go visual" Some discussion about the presentations he used: Forum members have any comments on that? (Excuse me if this has already been discussed). I put the jpgs on my iPod (30GB, color screen) and use thePhoto capabilities for my presentation. It just looks a whole lot better while doing it, soMaybe there's an added danger in the elegance.I also like Keynote because it allows you to export slides to jpgs and gives the option ofSaving each new bit of info to a new slide. But I agree that Keynote falls into the same kinds ofHamfisted communication methods. PPLooks especially clunky next to it. No charts, no words, noFour months later I'm still getting email from people who were in the audience saying itWas the most memorable presentation they'd seen all year. ThenI talked, using the images to support and illustrate my message. I only had images on my slides, usingKeynote's superior shadowing and animation options to make them look really nice. I made handouts with my stats in legible and understandable charts that peopleCould refer to during the talk and take home later. I made a Keynote presentation with noText. All myGear-cables, ipod, infrared dock and remote control-fit in one pocket and weigh lessAfter years of boredom with speakers using PP and reading their boring slides toMe, I did something kind of strange this past fall. ![]() Perhaps for people in the very front, there was aBit more detail to be had in the traditional slides, but in general they were darker with anAmber cast that deadened some of the colors.I have also seen very poor quality images from digital projectors, usually due to theOperator choosing wacky preset adjustments available in the projector menus, or fromWorking with archaeologists, who are by trade biased towards visual presentations, I haveBeen able to observe that, given the choice (= working on Macs) and an equal trainingGround (many are used to PP, have to be introduced to Keynote), most of my colleaguesReasons: the intuitive interface, the elegant workflow, the superiorQuality of typesetting, and the reliable handling of imported graphicNervous breakdowns caused by last-minute PP breakdowns are also avoided.Keynote is taught to be used mainly as the projection tool rather than aI also routinely encourage my colleagues to export their slides as Acrobat PDFMulti-page documents for portability (i.e. The images were of paintings, and the originals were in a nearby galleryWhich helped verify these observations. They wereBigger, brighter, displayed very good color, and were sharp (if lacking in fine details whenViewed close up). Many of the imagesWere the same in each lecture, and I would guess that for the vast majority of the 200 +Audience members the computer projector had the superior image quality. I recently attended an art lecture with two speakers back to back - oneUsed a computer projector and the other showed traditional slides. Compare the present stateResponse to Apple's Keynote vs Microsoft's PowerPointI don't use PowerPoint or Keynote - I learned Macromedia Director and Flash (thoroughly) before I ever got my hands on PowerPoint or Keynote so they've always seemed laughable to me. FileMakerEventually got under Apple's wing, PP was bought by Microsoft. Their user interfaces shared a number of features. Using PDF for theProjection, with Acrobat or even the remarkable but underrated Preview app on OS X Macs,Leads to leaner presentations with a minimum of gimmicks.A digression into the evolutionary analysis of software development: it isInteresting to note that the "ur"-PowerPoint was initially created by the same outfit as the"ur"-FileMaker DBMS.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorScott ArchivesCategories |