In it, the Republican presidential nominee talked candidly about the 47 percent of Americans who he said won’t vote for him because they are “dependent on government” and “believe that they are victims.” (The full video and transcript from the fundraiser are available here video highlights are here.)Using the Mail Merge Feature in Microsoft Word 2016 for Mac. Create, edit, collaborate, and share documents using Word for Mac.Earlier this week, MoJo Washington bureau chief David Corn published secret video of a Mitt Romney fundraiser in Florida in May. With Microsoft 365, you get features as soon as they are released ensuring you’re always working with the latest. Microsoft 365 includes premium Word, Excel, and PowerPoint apps, 1 TB cloud storage in OneDrive, advanced security, and more, all in one convenient subscription.
Ama In Word 2011 How To Add DropboxEnter the details for the source and click OK.10:45 a.m. In the Create Source dialog box, next to Type of Source, select the type of source you want to use (for example, a book section or a website). On the References tab, click Insert Citation. As in Ama going to lose this battle with Apple.Click at the end of the sentence or phrase that you want to cite. Got a question? Head on over there and ask it! Want some answers? Check ’em out below:Microsoft’s ‘Windows App Store’ images leak, look suspiciously like Apple’s Mac App Store Ap. Mac Linux Usb Loader 3.3 Download Adobe Acrobat Pdfmaker For Mac Outlook Email Bulf Titler Create Mac Image For Deployment Autoimg Play Nanny Mania 3 How To Add Dropbox As A Place In Office For Mac Ama In Word For Mac Computer Self Defence Training Manual Dpx Player For Mac Hearts Of Iron 4 Peace ConferenceCorn has popped over to Reddit today to answer readers’ questions from 12 p.m.![]() In between all that, I do various appearances on MSNBC. Seems the source was right about that…As for the legality of what happened, I will leave that to experts on Florida law.Answer: Not like the past few….I get up early, check email and Twitter to make sure there’s no major news, get the kids to school, then head to the office, where I oversee a great DC bureau of 8 reporters and editors, as we do all we can to find scoops and post stories that explain and advance important stories. The source realized that s/he would be in the room with a presidential candidate and thought that Romney might just say something interesting enough to deserve recording. ![]() ![]() When he does, it will once again raise the knotty issue of…what about the ten years prior to 2010? I was just talking about this on the Diane Rehm Show (guest-hosted by Susan Page!), and we all sort of agreed this could be a problem and wondered why he didn’t release the return earlier to avoid this potential dustup so late in the final stretch.Update: Word just came in that Romney is releasing his 2011 return this Friday afternoon. He has pledged to release his 2011 return in October. I do know–or assume–that the tax return issue will become an inconvenient matter for Romney again, and soon. Did John McCain hang on to the 23 years of returns Romney gave him in 2008? I don’t know. Really, the best way to support this is to read the work that is done, subscribe and donate. And we at Mother Jones–and other outlets–work hard to preserve this sort of kick-ass, independent, probing journalism. Is this type of writing definitely doomed and headed towards extinction because of monetary and technological factors? Is it a function of the audience for this type of journalism disappearing? Other then buying the publications that run this kind of work, is there any other way to support and encourage the return of “shoe leather” investigative reporting?Answer: You’re right. Hmmm.Mother Jones is one of the few English language publications that still dedicates the time, money, resources and column inches to real on the ground, investigative, researched journalism. And will also release a summation of the tax rates he’s paid the previous 20 years, but not the returns. That said, I figured there was a slight chance (<5%) that some Dr. And we looked quite closely to determine if we could see any evidence of manipulation or cutting. Fabulous read.How did you authenticate the video when it was first presented to you?Why was so much of the video blurred out in your initial release of it? I understand the need to protect your source, but does offering a heavily blurred video pose credibility issues in how it will be percievedAnswer: Good Qs….If you watch the full video, you can see Romney say things that indicate when and where it happened. What can be done to restore muckraking journalism in the traditions of Jack Anderson et al? We need it.Answer: My pal Mark Feldstein wrote a great book that came out last year about Jack Anderson and Richard Nixon. Was going to post along this line. Once more, here’s how to donate or subscribe to MoJo: Yes. But we believed that enough was shown to indicate this was the real deal. Also, it seemed to me, if this was a diabolical plot, then the video would have already been disseminated in a more conventional manner of leaking.We blurred initially because the source requested that. But I spent time communicating with the source and becoming familiar with him/her to increase my level of confidence. The source says that s/he quickly turned the device back on and estimates that one to two minutes, maybe less was not recorded. S/he figured that the device had timed out or been brushed in a manner that caused it to turn off. The source explained that s/he noticed, 35 minutes in, that the device was not recording. Obviously there’s some blurring and it was cut into at least 2 pieces but aside from that was anything chopped out?Answer: The video, as I’ve explained, came to me in two files. But what can you do about that?How long and how hard did you laugh when the Romney campaign said the video was “debunked” and “selectively edited”? Be honest, are you still laughing right now?Answer: Well, they had to say something….But it was odd that they made that claim after essentially confirming it was real when Romney declared his remarks “off the cuff.” (Which seems to me to be one way of saying, “what I really mean.”) Here’s a further explanation I wrote of how Romney’s debunking claim was debunked: Follow up question: What, if any, edits were done to the video. Sure, there was the chance that some would have taken issue with the blurring. Download adobe photoshop for free mac april 2018Believe me, as much as anyone, I’d like to know what wasn’t captured on the video. Still, rightwingers are cooking up conspiracy theories and claiming we’ve altered the tapes. Not a single thing has been edited or doctored.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorScott ArchivesCategories |